ブログ

ブログ詳細

Jolyon Palmer column: Charles Leclerc win at Monza leaves Formula 1 in a tangle


We and our partners utilize technology, such as cookies, and gather info that is browsing to personalise the information and advertisements and to give you the best experience.
Please let us know if you agree.
From Jolyon Palmer
Former Renault motorist and BBC Radio 5 Live commentator
Former F1 driver Jolyon Palmer, who left Renault throughout the 2017 season, provides insight and analysis from the viewpoint of their opponents and is part of the BBC team.
Charles Leclerc drove wonderfully on Sunday to acquire the Grand Prix – for forcing Lewis Hamilton off the street in the second 30, but he must happen to be nominated.
The fact Leclerc got off with that has abandoned human body the FIA, the race stewards as well as the race manager in an embarrassing Rubik’s cube of a tangle.
Let us start with the truth.
As Hamilton tried a movement leclerc pushed Hamilton off the road in the braking zone for the chicane on lap 23. This is incontrovertible.
Hamilton kicked up the grass in his evasive action left handed behind and the Ferrari transferred across, and was made to cut the chicane since.
This isn’t fair racing from Leclerc. The principles dictate that in these scenarios motorists must leave a car’s width of space for their opponents, especially in the flying areas, in which they’re in full control of their car’s placement, unlike at the apex or exit, where little slides can cause them to deviate in their initial and intended trajectory.
Leclerc moved into the appropriate while he pressured and was braking Hamilton off the road. Hamilton couldn’t do anything about it, other than to go off and cut on the corner as he couldn’t back out from alongside the Ferrari guy and was on the limit of the wheels or to crash with Leclerc. Nor should he’s needed to.
This past year, Red Bull’s Max Verstappen was penalised five seconds for an identical breach on Mercedes’ Valtteri Bottas in Monza at turn one, and it cost the Dutchman per podium.
Together with Leclerc, however, the FIA brought out its step rather than keeping things constant. The warning flag was instead shown by them to Leclerc.
It is effectively just a slap on the wrist; although Rush manager Michael Masi likens this into a card in football.
The race stewards are at liberty to explore any incident, regardless of if the flag is used by Masi. But in such a case no action was taken by them.
Some have seen that as it being bottled by the stewards using a decision, against a race-leading Ferrari, in Monza, surrounded by 100,000 or so Italian fans wearing red. Hamilton along with Mercedes team manager Toto Wolff made a stage.
In my opinion, the decision was clear-cut. As it might have ruined the race, so the rules are the rules, much as I didn’t want to observe a penalty and they must be adhered to for the benefit of the sport over the amusement factor of the show.
This can be the equal of Manchester City being 0-0 with Crystal Palace of F1 and in the 60th minute Raheem Sterling has been brought down in the penalty area and that the underdogs have a man sent off.
Sure, it ruins the sport decrease Palace to 10 men and to give City the penalty, but these are the rules. You can not do it because everybody wishes to find a more balanced game for the 30 minutes.
And you especially can not give it their 25,000 lovers from the crowd will be unhappy and because the sport is at Crystal Palace.
I discovered it uncomfortable seeing Masi attempting to spell out the situation.
He said the warning flag’s revival was a measure caused at the request of drivers and their teams to allow for racing that was harder.
However, what precedent does this set?
It means drivers are allowed to commit one offence in a rush and eliminate it. What sort of racing is all that going to produce? And is that moral or honest?
Verstappen got off with a suspicious race-winning move on Leclerc back in Austria and it’s set up a new precedent for pushing motorists off the street on the outside to the corner’s exit. But in most ways the situation of Verstappen was more easy to defend than that one from Leclerc.
It might seem drivers are permitted to force each other off on the exterior in front of a corner too Since Leclerc was granted only a warning.
If that is the situation, there is a severe risk unless your vehicle is pretty much fully ahead before really getting to the corner, that the days of an overtake round the exterior are all well and truly over.
Masi went on to explain a reason Verstappen might have been penalised last year and Leclerc maybe not this season was this year there wasn’t contact and because that there was.
On its surface, that makes some sense. However, in reality there was no contact this time last year than Bottas failed in his place because evasive actions was taken by Hamilton.
Actually, Bottas had more space than Hamilton did annually; he didn’t budge and the incident ended in light touch.
Which leads me to the next debatable situation – motorists might go searching for a little bit of contact on the outdoors, just to show to the FIA the absolute obvious, and so receive a penalty for the aggressor who’s clearly contravening the rules.
With safety coming back beneath the very nose of F1 after Anthoine Hubert in Belgium’s death, which sort of a statement is that?
It sounds idiotic or irresponsible, or maybe both.
Wolff made this exact point following the race.
Asked when the black flag promoted drivers taking additional liberties and started a can of worms, then he said:”There will be more touching. It’ll be more of a practice that is common. My opinion is that it will go to the stage it will wind up in a collision and then we’ll bale out again”
Wolff is completely perfect. Passengers will do whatever they can to get an advantage. If suddenly they can get away with pushing against a different driver off the trail once they’ll get it done. And when for the driver it is beneficial to have a small tap with the vehicle this will be looked for by them.
The next issue with the flag is whether it a yellow card that is , or a card for that particular offence only? The FIA claims the former – that some driving offence that is new would depend.
Leclerc’s second on-the-edge movement came after, under additional strain from Hamilton, he cut the chicane at turn and then meandered the curved up straight from Curva Grande, with a surprising jink to the left as Hamilton seemed to get a run on him.
Hamilton ultimately lost his sanity and supported out, and it Leclerc defence halted another prospect of a move.
This moment, the cutting of this corner (which was researched ) was fine – Leclerc rejoined and certainly didn’t gain an advantage.
Nevertheless, the sudden dip across the nose of Hamilton throughout the flat out Curva Grande corner (which wasn’t researched ) was once again right on the limit.
In isolation I could see that being enabled, as the lines the’ straight’ blurs . However, with the backdrop of the black-and-white flag deployed, this was a second offence that might have observed a red.
The problem for me is the stewarding is inconsistent – a point Hamilton made following the race.
The stewards have a tough task to perform , they take it badly and they try to do it. But at times it may feel as though decisions aren’t based on racing, but on the popularity of this decision with all the masses.
Back in China, Toro Rosso’s Daniil Kvyat – nicknamed’the torpedo’ following a succession of incidents a few years back – was handed a whopping induce punishment in China for what appeared to be a racing incident when he battled with McLarens on the opening lap.
Would Leclerc have received the same penalty? I doubt it.
The fact is, Leclerc is a driver. In actuality, I’ve never known a front-runner that was popular and race-winner than the Monegasque driver within my own time. Has that, in addition to the fact he drives a car, had a bearing on the result this weekend?
Back in Canada, I applauded the FIA for sticking to the guns – and also the rulebook – if yanking Sebastian Vettel a penalty for a breach of rules when he rejoined the track after going off and impeding Hamilton.
But since then the requirement from the teams and drivers to’let them race’ – that is also popular with the fans – has caused a problematic situation where it is tough to predict what their next decision will be, and where consistency may appear to be in short supply.
{This all overshadows the fact it was a race and these were drives from both Leclerc and Hamilton|This oversh

Read more: totalsporty.com/wwe-tips/

corona hair design

住所     〒 810-0042
        福岡県福岡市中央区赤坂1-10-16 4F
アクセス   福岡市地下鉄空港線 赤坂駅 徒歩1分
TEL      092-724-6556
営業時間  火~金 12:00~22:00
        土・日・祝 10:00~19:00
お休み    月・第3火曜日

当店facebookページはこちら
http://on.fb.me/1vLhQ9A
  • facebook
  • twitter